Aniołki stand out with relatively good building aesthetics due to their historical character and the presence of greenery; however, they do not match the most prestigious districts of Gdańsk in terms of architectural coherence and quality.

Aniołki offer good access to trade and services due to their proximity to the center of Gdańsk, but lack their own well-developed commercial and service infrastructure. Basic shops and services are available, but some of the facilities are located in neighboring districts.

The Aniołki district offers moderate access to cultural institutions and entertainment events, but it does not provide the opportunity to fully engage in cultural life at the level of the largest and most active districts of Gdańsk.

The Aniołki district offers a moderate availability of green areas and recreational infrastructure. Although it is close to significant urban parks and has some squares and paths, it does not reach the level of coastal districts or Oliwa in terms of the quantity and quality of greenery.

The analysis of available data and residents' opinions shows that the technical infrastructure in the Aniołki district is at a very high level. Both the condition of the roads and sidewalks are rated as good or very good – systematic maintenance and regular repairs are carried out, which limits the number of serious surface damages. Street lighting also does not raise major concerns – there are no complaints about poorly lit streets or lighting failures, which increases the safety of residents. The main infrastructural issues in the district are the problem with the availability of parking spaces and high traffic intensity, which is typical for centrally located districts of Gdańsk near the city center. Despite this, access to efficient sewage systems, water supply systems, and stable energy infrastructure is rated as very good – there are no mass complaints regarding failures or interruptions in supply. The technical internet and telecommunications infrastructure also meets residents' requirements, with no significant interruptions or limitations reported. The efficiency of waste management is also maintained at a high level. In summary, Aniołki presents a high standard of infrastructure, receiving a higher rating only in districts where parking issues and traffic intensity are lower, or where the quality of life related to infrastructure is even higher. A rating of 5 means that the district ranks among the top in Gdańsk in terms of the quality of technical infrastructure.

The district of Aniołki receives a good rating (4/6) for street noise levels, air pollution, and street cleanliness – it is moderately quiet, cleanliness is at an acceptable level, but the impact of busy routes and institutions lowers the environmental comfort.

The availability of real estate listings in the Aniołki district is rated as low – the offerings are dominated by occasional rental apartments, and the number of listings for sale remains limited.

Aniołki are characterized by moderate affordability – apartment prices are only slightly higher than the city average, and the proximity to the center affects both attractiveness and cost. The price dynamics indicate a slight decrease; however, it is not a district for those looking for the cheapest solutions.

Aniołki is a district for which there is a lack of detailed safety data; however, the general opinions of residents describe it as moderately safe, with no major issues related to crime or serious incidents. Factors such as lighting, the presence of patrols, and infrastructure are rated adequately, although they do not stand out compared to the best districts in Gdańsk.

The Aniołki district stands out for its very good accessibility to stops and high frequency of services, offering easy and quick access to the center of Gdańsk and other key districts of the city. The rating is lowered by the lack of direct access to SKM/PKM and a less developed tram network compared to the top communication districts.

Brzeźno presents a moderate architectural attractiveness with a clear predominance of buildings from the Polish People's Republic, modernized blocks, and a favorable location close to green areas and the beach.

Brzeźno offers very good access to shops, services, and dining options, especially considering the specifics of the seaside district. The commercial and service infrastructure provides residents with everyday convenience, although it still falls short compared to the largest shopping districts in Gdańsk.

Brzeźno offers good access to outdoor events, museums, and seasonal attractions by the beach, but has a limited number of permanent cultural and entertainment institutions – hence the rating is good, but not very good.

Brzeźno offers very good access to green and recreational areas thanks to the presence of Brzeźno Park, beaches, bike paths, and places for active leisure. Residents highly appreciate the recreational opportunities and the proximity to nature, although in terms of the size of green areas, the district ranks slightly lower than the record-setting Przymorze Wielkie.

Brzeźno receives one of the highest ratings in Gdańsk for technical infrastructure – the average rating for the condition of roads and communication is as high as 4.28/5, placing this area at the top of the rankings. The condition of roads and sidewalks is very good: they are well-maintained, convenient for pedestrians and cyclists, regularly undergo modernization, and do not pose difficulties for daily use. Street lighting is efficient and modern, which improves the safety of residents after dark. Brzeźno does not struggle with chronic traffic jams or difficulties in accessing public transport – the area is appreciated for its good connections with other districts. A modern sewage system is in place, and there are no recurring issues related to water supply or electrical network failures. An important asset is also the development of bike paths, recreational areas, and a walking promenade, which increases the infrastructural attractiveness and accessibility for all groups of residents, including those with strollers or bicycles. Residents describe the district as safe and pedestrian-friendly, and renovation and modernization work is carried out continuously. No significant issues have been reported regarding waste collection, internet access, or other basic infrastructural services. A certain downside – similar to other districts in Gdańsk – is the limited availability of parking spaces; however, this problem is not as severe here as in the outskirts of the city or in the southern districts. Residents' opinions and the analysis of investment reports clearly indicate that public infrastructure in Brzeźno meets high standards and is still subject to ongoing improvements. In summary, Brzeźno deserves a very high rating for technical infrastructure – it is one of the best-developed districts in this regard in Gdańsk, although there is still a small step to full perfection (rating 6/6).

Brzeźno receives a very good rating in terms of noise and pollution, influenced by its proximity to the sea, a significant amount of greenery, good air quality, and the overall cleanliness of the streets—especially outside the tourist season.

Brzeźno presents an average level of real estate availability – there is a moderate number of apartments and houses for sale and rent, but the variety does not match that of the top districts in Gdańsk.

Brzeźno is one of the most expensive districts in Gdańsk – prices are significantly above the city average, which definitely reduces the accessibility of the local housing market.

Brzeźno is rated as a district with an average to good level of safety. It is not among the safest or the most dangerous areas, and the opinions of residents are rather neutral or moderately positive.

Brzeźno receives the highest rating for public transport due to the very good accessibility of stops, high frequency of services, and direct, fast connections to the city center and other key districts of Gdańsk.

Brętowo is a district characterized by low building intensity, a large amount of greenery, and a loose, single-family urban structure, which translates into a very good overall aesthetic. It is not an area with the highest architectural prestige, but it provides attractive and intimate living conditions, enjoying positive feedback from the local community.

Brętowo is characterized by its tranquility and friendly environment; however, the commercial and service offerings here are average – there is a lack of larger stores, restaurants, and a more developed service infrastructure.

Brętowo offers a very limited cultural and entertainment offer – there are no cinemas, theaters, museums, or traditional clubs, and cultural events are organized sporadically and on a small scale.

Brętowo offers access to natural green areas, cool meadows, and forest paths, but the recreational infrastructure is less developed than in the top districts of Gdańsk. Locals mainly use the nearby forests and limited playgrounds, which is why the rating is good, but not outstanding.

Analyzing the available research context and the opinions of residents, Brętowo stands out positively compared to many other districts of Gdańsk – both in terms of road surface quality and the condition of sidewalks. Reports indicate that regular repairs and modernizations are carried out here, which helps maintain an acceptable and safe standard of infrastructure for users. Residents do not report serious issues with street lighting – the network of streetlights is sufficient, and there are no signals of threats related to insufficient lighting. The water and sewage infrastructure, as well as the electrical infrastructure, do not exhibit particular flaws compared to the rest of the city, allowing them to be assessed as stable and reliable. Internet and telecommunications are at a good level, which is standard in Gdańsk. However, weaker points include a lack of parking spaces and occasionally increased street traffic, which can be felt especially by residents with cars. Brętowo is not among the neglected districts, but it does not reach the level of the top tier (like Brzeźno or Przymorze), where the infrastructure is rated as nearly exemplary. Compared to the southern and western districts of Gdańsk (e.g., Matarnia, Jasień, Ujeścisko–Łostowice), Brętowo ranks significantly higher in technical and functional terms. Residents appreciate the proximity to the city center and the urban character of the district, although they also emphasize the increasing traffic intensity, typical for areas with good accessibility. Despite this, the district maintains a satisfactory level of infrastructure across all key areas and does not require immediate, urgent municipal interventions. In summary, Brętowo deserves a solid rating of "good" (4/6), with a positive trend towards further improvement in infrastructure quality in the coming years.

Brętowo is characterized by very good air quality, moderate noise levels, and a high level of street cleanliness – it is one of the better-rated districts in Gdańsk in this regard.

Brętowo is characterized by a low availability of real estate listings – single-family homes dominate here, and the number of sales and rental advertisements is small.

Brętowo offers property prices slightly below the city average of Gdańsk, making it a moderately affordable district in terms of purchasing and renting apartments, especially in the context of a quiet location close to green areas.

Brętowo is considered one of the safest districts in Gdańsk, with low crime rates, good lighting, and positive reviews from residents.

Brętowo offers a moderately good quality of public transport, with satisfactory availability of PKM and bus stops, but with some limitations in frequency and no direct tram connections to the city center. Connections to other districts are decent, but they are not among the best in the city.

Chełm is characterized by an average aesthetic of development – the dominant structures are blocks from the 70s and 80s, and there are also newer investments; however, the lack of urban coherence and architectural diversity of the neighborhoods affect the average rating.

Chełm stands out with a very high level of accessibility to trade and services – residents have everything they need for daily life in the immediate vicinity.

The Chełm district has a very limited cultural and entertainment offer, focusing mainly on family activities and individual local initiatives. Residents have to rely on the richer offerings of the city center, Wrzeszcz, or other central districts.

Chełm offers access to basic green areas and playgrounds, but it lacks large parks and developed recreational infrastructure. The standard of green areas is rated as average by residents, with a predominance of small squares and playgrounds over large, attractive parks.

Chełm, although it is one of the more dynamically developing districts of Gdańsk, is experiencing a number of problems typical for the southern areas of the city. The quality of neighborhood roads and sidewalks leaves much to be desired – residents often report pothole-ridden streets, makeshift detours, and a lack of paved surfaces in the less central parts of the district. The lighting infrastructure, although being modernized in the main thoroughfares, still does not meet expectations in terms of safety and comfort in many places on side streets or in new residential areas. The sewage system is also problematic in some of the newer developments, where periodic overloads and the need for further investment work have been reported. Chełm has a relatively good connection to the center of Gdańsk thanks to a developed tram and bus network, but the lack of parking spaces and overcrowding on existing lines during peak hours diminish the comfort for residents. Internet and telecommunications are generally at a decent level, but the dispersion of new residential investments means that standards are not uniform everywhere. Waste management operates efficiently, but complaints concern the location and number of selective collection points. Despite gradual investments and improvements in some aspects of infrastructure, the challenges related to maintaining high-quality roads, sidewalks, and lighting are still relevant. This area should therefore be assessed as average compared to the city – Chełm performs better than peripheral, neglected districts, but still clearly worse than the northern and central parts of Gdańsk.

The Chełm district ranks moderately well in Gdańsk in terms of noise, air pollution, and street cleanliness – a rating of 4/6. There are no serious industrial problems or heavy traffic, but it is a sprawling residential area with moderate car traffic and developing infrastructure.

Chełm stands out for its good availability of apartments for both sale and rent, and offers a wide selection of properties of various types; however, it falls short in scale compared to the largest districts like Wrzeszcz or Przymorze.

Chełm is one of the most affordable districts of Gdańsk, with apartment and house prices significantly lower than the city average, good access to various purchasing options, and a favorable price-to-quality-of-life and infrastructure ratio.

Chełm is a district considered to be moderately safe – there are no serious crime issues reported here, although residents see room for improvement in terms of infrastructure and the frequency of patrols.

Chełm offers good access to tram and bus stops, as well as relatively frequent services; however, during peak hours, there is congestion, and access to the SKM/PKM trains is limited.

Jasień receives an average rating because it offers numerous modern residential developments, but there is a lack of architectural coherence and mature urban greenery.

Jasień is characterized by very good access to trade and services – the district is dynamically developing, with more and more shops and service points being established, which provides residents with a high level of comfort in their daily lives.

Jasień is a peripheral district of Gdańsk with a poor cultural and entertainment offer, limited mainly to local initiatives and libraries, without cinemas, theaters, or museums. To take advantage of a richer offer, residents often have to commute to the city center or Wrzeszcz.

Jasień has quite good green areas and recreational infrastructure, which are gradually developing, although there is still a noticeable deficit of larger, well-equipped parks and completed recreational areas compared to the northern districts of the city.

Analyzing the available reports, residents' opinions, and official data, the district of Jasień is one of the least developed in terms of technical infrastructure in Gdańsk. The main problem remains the terrible condition of the local roads – many reports are made regarding potholes, mud, makeshift detours, and dust during dry periods and mud during wet ones. Sidewalks are often unfinished or do not exist at all, which complicates the daily functioning of pedestrians, especially children and the elderly. Street lighting is insufficient in many places – delays in modernization and the establishment of new lighting points have been reported, which lowers the sense of safety after dark. The low number of public transport connections and the long travel time to the city center are also problematic. The sewage system does not cover all neighborhoods – new investments do not always keep pace with the rapid development of the district. Complaints about traffic organization and the instability of telecommunication infrastructure are also emerging. However, an improvement has been noted in the southern part of Jasień after the opening of al. Adamowicza; the impact of this investment (improved traffic flow, increased property values) still does not compensate for the widely reported inconveniences. The overall picture of the district confirms that Jasień requires further significant investments in roads, sidewalks, lighting, sewage, and other infrastructure elements. These problems place Jasień among the least developed districts in this regard in Gdańsk, hence the low overall rating (2/6), indicating "poor" infrastructure.

Jasień received very good ratings for low noise levels, air pollution, and street cleanliness – residents praise the moderate traffic intensity, lack of smog, and high cleanliness. This district is among the top Gdańsk neighborhoods in terms of ecological comfort.

Jasień stands out for its high availability of real estate, especially new apartments, which makes it one of the better districts in terms of housing options in Gdańsk.

Jasień stands out with moderately affordable real estate prices, which are significantly lower than in the coastal and central districts of Gdańsk, yet it is not among the cheapest areas of the city. It is a good option for families and individuals looking for a reasonable compromise between price and quality of life.

Jasień is rated as a district with an average level of safety – it does not stand out for having particularly high or low feelings of safety according to available resident opinions and statistical analyses.

Public transport in the Jasień district is rated low due to the limited number of connections, low frequency of services, and the need for transfers when traveling to the city center and other districts.

Kokoszki are characterized by a predominance of industrial and service buildings, as well as spatial chaos, which significantly reduces their architectural attractiveness and the overall aesthetics of the district.

The availability of trade and services in Kokoszki is poor – residents point to deficiencies in basic infrastructure and a small number of shops, restaurants, and services, which is confirmed by both expert analyses and the opinions of the local community.

Kokoszki offer very limited access to cultural and entertainment institutions and events, which translates to a low rating in terms of cultural life.

The Kokoszki district has a moderate access to green and recreational areas, with a predominance of peripheral areas, forests, and individual playgrounds rather than large urban parks or extensive recreational infrastructure.

The Kokoszki district, according to available analyses and residents' opinions, belongs to the areas of Gdańsk with distinctly weaker technical infrastructure. The condition of the roads is particularly criticized here – many routes, especially residential and side streets, are full of potholes, unrenovated, and makeshift, which complicates both vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Sidewalks are often discontinuous, in poor technical condition, and the lack of consistent investments raises the level of frustration among residents. Street lighting in peripheral areas remains insufficient, which translates into a sense of limited safety after dark. Many comments concern the sewage system – this system is underdeveloped, with complaints about frequent failures and problems with stormwater drainage. Furthermore, the availability of public transport is rated as poor, with long travel times to the city center and few bus lines. There is a lack of bike paths and convenient pedestrian crossings. Residents also complain about a chronic lack of parking spaces and frequent traffic jams, which is a consequence of the lack of new investments. Although minor repairs have been carried out in several places, the overall level of infrastructure is, according to rankings and residents' opinions, clearly below the average for Gdańsk (similarly to the neighboring districts of Matarni and Osowa). The efficiency of waste management, the quality of the internet network, and the stability of power supply remain at a satisfactory but not particularly outstanding level. Considering all these criteria, Kokoszki deserves a rating of "2" – weak infrastructure that requires urgent, comprehensive investments.

Kokoszki is characterized by moderate traffic, low industrial activity, and good air quality and cleanliness of the streets, which results in a relatively low level of noise and pollution compared to more urbanized parts of Gdańsk.

The availability of real estate listings in Kokoszki is low – the offer mainly consists of houses and a few apartments, and new listings appear rarely.

Kokoszki is one of the cheapest districts of Gdańsk, with average prices for apartments and houses significantly below the city average. Affordability is rated by residents as very high, and the price-to-offered space ratio is one of the best in the entire city.

Kokoszki receives a good rating (4/6) because there are no signals of serious safety issues, although it is not among the safest districts according to research and the opinions of residents of Gdańsk.

Public transport in Kokoszki is rated as poor – the district has a limited number of bus connections, low frequency of services, and difficult communication with the city center and other parts of Gdańsk.

Krakowiec–Górki Zachodnie is distinguished by a large amount of greenery and low building intensity, which attracts those who value tranquility and a natural environment. However, due to the small number of modern investments and rather average architectural coherence, the district deserves a good, but not the highest rating.

The Krakowiec–Górki Zachodnie district is characterized by very limited access to trade and services, as confirmed by both analyses and residents' opinions.

The Krakowiec–Górki Zachodnie district has a very limited cultural and entertainment offer – there are no cinemas, theaters, museums, or larger clubs, and most events are seasonal or local in nature.

The Krakowiec–Górki Zachodnie district offers good conditions for recreation due to the large amount of greenery and natural waterfront areas; however, there is a lack of larger organized parks, modern playgrounds, and developed recreational infrastructure known from the central or northern districts of Gdańsk.

Based on the available research context, the district of Krakowiec–Górki Zachodnie was not mentioned among the districts with dramatically poor infrastructure (e.g., Matarnia, Letnica, Jasień, Ujeścisko–Łostowice), but it also did not rank among the best-rated ones (Brzeźno, Wrzeszcz, Przymorze, Oliwa). It is a district located on the outskirts of Gdańsk, with a semi-recreational and port character, where the priority is not always the rapid development of road or sidewalk infrastructure. There is no significant traffic congestion reported here, but the infrastructure, especially in some areas, can be neglected or in need of modernization – typical for peripheral districts. There are no reports of serious sewage failures or power outages; however, common issues may include sparsely located or makeshift sidewalks, poor lighting in some places, and limited availability of public transport (buses). The district, however, benefits from municipal investments in the sewage and water supply networks in recent years (according to the city's strategic investments), for the benefit of residents and tourism (port, sailing, visitors to Sobieszewo Island). Residents' opinions, although not numerous, emphasize the overall lack of major inconveniences, but also the average quality compared to the more developed parts of the city. The efficiency of waste collection, road maintenance, and the functionality of technical networks are described as acceptable, although investments in improving sidewalks and lighting are expected. In summary, Krakowiec–Górki Zachodnie presents technical infrastructure at an average, "three-point" level – it meets the current needs of residents but does not set any urban quality standards.

Krakowiec–Górki Zachodnie is a district with very good air quality and low noise levels due to low traffic intensity, a significant share of green areas, and minimal industrial presence. Residents rarely report pollution or acoustic nuisances.

The availability of real estate listings in the Krakowiec–Górki Zachodnie district is very low – only a few listings appear on the market sporadically, most often concerning houses or plots of land. The variety and number of apartments and other types of properties here is definitely the smallest in the entire Gdańsk area.

I assess the affordability of real estate in the Krakowiec–Górki Zachodnie district as average, mainly due to the very limited supply of apartments and the lack of clear price data – the district is not among the most expensive, but it also does not stand out with distinctly low prices compared to the rest of Gdańsk.

The lack of detailed data on clear threats in the Krakowiec–Górki Zachodnie district, along with moderately good opinions from residents, allows for an assessment of safety at a good level, although not the highest.

Public transport in the Krakowiec–Górki Zachodnie district is rated as poor – the district has modest stop infrastructure, low frequency of services, and limited connections to the city center and the rest of the city.

Letnica receives an average rating mainly due to the dynamically developing modern construction, lack of architectural coherence, and immature urban greenery. Despite gradual improvements in its image, the district still combines new projects with neglected post-war buildings.

Letnica is characterized by a poor availability of shops, restaurants, and services, which is reflected in both the opinions of residents and the available analyses of the districts of Gdańsk.

Letnica offers a limited but growing cultural and entertainment offer, focusing on large events at the stadium and occasional outdoor events. However, there is a lack of permanent theaters, cinemas, or museums, as well as a rich club scene compared to the main districts of Gdańsk.

Letnica performs poorly in terms of green areas and recreational infrastructure – the district is mainly industrial, with a limited number of parks and recreational spaces.

Letnica is one of the worst-rated districts of Gdańsk in terms of technical infrastructure. Research and statements from residents indicate that the biggest problem is the very low quality of local and neighborhood roads – they are often damaged, with potholes and uneven surfaces. Sidewalks are few and poorly maintained, which hinders pedestrian communication, especially for the elderly and disabled. Street lighting can be insufficient, affecting the sense of safety – particularly after dark. Letnica also lacks an adequate number of parking spaces, and neighborhood parking lots, when they exist, are often overcrowded or poorly organized. The district regularly receives complaints about difficulties with transportation – both public and car-related, which is confirmed by a mere 2.86/5 rating from residents. The sewage and water-waste infrastructure has not experienced any major failures, but the lack of visible modernization investments poses a potential problem for the future. The energy and telecommunications networks function properly, although there is no advantage over other districts. Waste management operates at a standard level, but does not stand out in terms of organization. Although some renovations and modernizations have been carried out in public areas in recent years (especially in connection with sporting events at the stadium), this has not translated into an overall improvement in the quality of daily infrastructure for residents. Forum opinions and city reports consistently classify Letnica as a district in urgent need of investment and infrastructural modernization. Compared to the northern and central districts of Gdańsk, the technical standard of Letnica remains clearly lower in both subjective assessments from residents and in available rankings. In summary, Letnica is rated at a 'poor' level (rating 2) in terms of the technical infrastructure of the city of Gdańsk.

Letnica receives a low rating (2/6) due to high levels of street and industrial noise, polluted air, and unsatisfactory street cleanliness, as confirmed by both residents' opinions and social research results.

Letnica is experiencing an increase in the number of new investments; however, the overall availability of real estate listings remains low and is mainly limited to new development projects.

Letnica is characterized by some of the highest apartment prices in Gdańsk, clearly exceeding the city average, with limited supply and average social reception regarding the profitability of purchase.

Letnica receives a low rating in terms of safety due to poor street lighting, infrequent presence of patrols, and a higher crime rate than in the highest-rated districts.

Letnica is one of the districts with poor public transport accessibility in Gdańsk – the number of connections is limited, and the frequency of services is low, especially outside peak hours.

Matarnia is a district mostly characterized by low aesthetic quality of buildings, dominated by industrial and service construction, and a significant spatial chaos; single-family housing estates maintain a slightly higher quality, but they are exceptions in the context of the district.

Matarnia offers an average level of access to trade and services – there are a few larger retail points, but the daily local offerings and availability of basic services remain limited compared to the central or more urbanized districts of Gdańsk.

Matarnia receives a rating of 2 in the 'Culture and Entertainment' category because the cultural and entertainment offerings in the area are modest and mainly consist of small local initiatives, while larger attractions are located outside the district.

Matarnia has a moderate access to green and recreational areas – it is distinguished by its proximity to forests, however, the number of large parks, playgrounds, and recreational infrastructure is more modest compared to the highest-rated districts of Gdańsk.

Matarnia belongs to the group of districts in Gdańsk with the lowest-rated technical infrastructure. In terms of road conditions, residents frequently report problems – the streets are degraded, with numerous potholes and uneven surfaces, which significantly worsens driving comfort and safety. Even the main communication arteries leading through the district are insufficiently developed or congested, making travel to the center take up to an hour according to residents' cited opinions. There are definitely too few parking spaces in the vicinity of housing estates, schools, and bus stops, leading to complaints about daily difficulties in leaving a car. Sidewalks in many places are in poor technical condition, there is a lack of continuity in pedestrian routes, and the surface finishing can be provisional. Additionally, Matarnia practically lacks a network of cycling paths of appropriate standards. Street lighting, especially on the outskirts of the district, is insufficient, which raises the feeling of insecurity after dark and negatively affects the quality of life. Sewage and stormwater drainage, especially in the newer parts of the district, is an unresolved issue — there are reports of local flooding or system inefficiency during heavy rains. The analyzed materials do not indicate that the latest investments have significantly improved the technical situation – the district lags behind both the center and better-developed districts in northern Gdańsk. Residents point out that the city focuses investment expenditures elsewhere, and Matarnia is still waiting for the promised road repairs, lighting replacements, or modernization of the sewage network. In summary: the current level of infrastructure in Matarnia does not meet residents' expectations and requires urgent, extensive remedial actions in practically every analyzed category.

Matarnia is a district with good conditions in terms of low street noise levels and moderate air pollution levels, with a predominance of green areas and low urban traffic intensity outside the vicinity of the Airport. The cleanliness level is rated highly, although local noise sources related to transportation infrastructure (airport, main arteries) can temporarily worsen the quality of life.

Matarnia is characterized by a low availability of real estate listings, mainly limited to single-family homes. The lack of diversity and the small number of advertisements affect the rating, which is below average.

Matarnia is one of the cheapest districts of Gdańsk, where the prices of apartments and houses are significantly lower than the city average, and the real estate offerings are characterized by high affordability for buyers and renters.

Matarnia is generally perceived as a district without major threats; however, it does not stand out among the safest districts in terms of the sense of security, street lighting, and the presence of police patrols. There are no serious negative opinions from residents, but there are also no strong signals indicating a very high level of safety.

Public transport in Matarni is rated poorly mainly due to the low number of connections, infrequent bus services, and limited and time-consuming commutes to the center and other districts of Gdańsk.

The Młyniska district receives the lowest rating for the aesthetics of its buildings due to the dominance of industrial infrastructure, neglected facades, and a lack of urban greenery.

Młyniska is a district with low availability of trade and services – there are few shops, restaurants, and basic services, and residents' opinions on this matter are rather negative.

Młyniska is a district with a very limited cultural and entertainment offer – there are no theaters, cinemas, museums, or significant cultural events here, and residents must rely on the offerings of neighboring districts or the city center when needed.

The Młyniska district offers limited access to green and recreational areas, mainly due to its industrial character and the small number of parks and playgrounds.

The analysis of available data and residents' opinions indicates that Młyniska is among the districts with moderately good technical infrastructure. When assessing the condition of the roads, it can be observed that most of the main thoroughfares are maintained in adequate condition, although side streets and industrial sections still require modernization. In recent years, significant investments have been made in new street lighting and the development and renovation of the sewage network, which positively distinguishes Młyniska from completely neglected districts. Sidewalks and pedestrian accessibility are satisfactory, although there are reported needs for repairs in some less frequented locations. The water and sewage system operates without major disruptions, and failures are rare. Energy supply and internet quality are at the city average level – no significant outages or technical problems have been reported. The issue of parking spaces and street cleanliness is less favorable, which residents particularly signal during higher truck traffic in the industrial area. Compared to districts like Brzeźno or Wrzeszcz, where the infrastructure is at a very high level, Młyniska performs somewhat weaker; however, the investment progress and stability of basic services place this district above average – hence the final rating is good (4/6).

Młyniska is characterized by a low rating in terms of noise and pollution – the influence of industry, proximity to the port, and intense truck traffic dominate here, resulting in frequent complaints from residents about smog and noise.

The availability of real estate listings in Młyniska is assessed as poor – there are very few listings on the market, both in terms of quantity and the variety of available apartments and houses.

The affordability of apartments and houses in the Młyniska district of Gdańsk should be rated as average – prices are not among the most affordable in the entire city, although they do not reach the level of the most expensive locations either.

Młyniska receives a low safety rating (2/6) due to neglected infrastructure, poor street lighting, low patrol presence, and a higher level of crime reported by residents.

Public transport in Młyniska is rated as average – the district has several tram and bus stops, but the frequency of services and the quality of connections to other districts and the city center do not stand out compared to the rest of the city.

Nowy Port is rated low in terms of building aesthetics – this district is characterized by numerous neglected tenement houses, poor urban greenery, and a predominance of an industrial atmosphere, although some individual places show potential for improvement.

Nowy Port offers good accessibility to trade and services – the commercial infrastructure is satisfactory, although it falls short compared to the top districts of Gdańsk. In the district, you can find basic shops, service points, and dining options.

Nowy Port offers good, though not outstanding, access to cultural and entertainment attractions, especially in the summer, but it falls short in this regard compared to the central districts and Wrzeszcz.

Nowy Port is characterized by very good accessibility to green and recreational areas, with particular emphasis on the proximity of Brzeźno Park, beaches, and coastal bike paths; residents' opinions indicate a high level of satisfaction with access to nature and recreation.

In the Nowy Port district, the technical condition of the infrastructure is rated as average. Available analyses and residents' opinions indicate that in recent years, many renovations have been carried out, which improved the main communication routes and the aesthetics of the space. However, there are still clear complaints regarding the condition of side roads, where the surface is worn out, and repairs are often temporary or patchy. Sidewalks have been partially renewed, although in many places they remain uneven and hinder movement for pedestrians and people with disabilities. Street lighting functions properly on the main streets, but there may be gaps on the outskirts, especially in less frequented areas. The sewage and water supply systems operate without significant failures, while a few investments in this area are still underway. The energy infrastructure is stable, and access to modern telecommunications services is not significantly lagging behind the rest of Gdańsk. Waste management proceeds without major complaints – garbage is collected regularly. Residents appreciate the improved condition of the main streets but emphasize the need for further modernization of side roads and systematic repairs of sidewalks. Frequent renovations increase the quality of life, but the overall picture of this district is still average compared to Gdańsk, especially in comparison with the northern districts and the city center. The persistent quality differences between the main and side elements of the infrastructure result in a moderate rating – the district requires further investments to catch up with better-developed areas of the city.

Nowy Port performs poorly in terms of noise and pollution due to its proximity to the port, heavy truck traffic, and the impact of industry. Residents express dissatisfaction with air quality, frequent disturbances, and issues with street cleanliness.

Nowy Port has an average availability of real estate listings – you can find apartments for sale and rent here, but the selection is not as wide as in the top districts of Gdańsk. The diversity of offers and turnover are not high, but the situation is slowly improving.

Nowy Port is one of the cheapest districts in Gdańsk, with prices significantly below the city average and high availability of apartments for typical buyers. The dynamic development of the district does not lead to sharp price increases, and the price-to-quality ratio is very favorable.

Nowy Port does not belong to either the group of the safest or the worst-rated districts of Gdańsk – safety is average, but it requires an increase in patrols and improvement of infrastructure.

Nowy Port offers good access to tram and bus stops as well as regular connections to the center of Gdańsk and other districts; however, limited access to SKM/PKM and congestion during peak hours reduce the comfort of transportation.

Oliwa stands out with its excellent architectural aesthetics due to its rich history, well-maintained facades, cohesive urban layout, and large green areas.

Oliwa stands out for its excellent accessibility to trade and services, offering residents a rich selection of shops, restaurants, and essential service points close to their place of residence.

Oliwa stands out for its very good accessibility to cultural institutions, a unique combination of historical and modern events, as well as a rich artistic offer, although it slightly lags behind the intensity of nightlife and the number of large events compared to the central districts of Gdańsk.

Oliwa is one of the highest-rated districts of Gdańsk in terms of the availability and quality of green and recreational areas – with a large number of parks, bike paths, playgrounds, and walking areas, as well as a very high level of resident satisfaction.

Analyzing the available research context, Oliwa is among the districts of Gdańsk with a very high level of technical infrastructure. Residents and official reports emphasize regular renovations and good quality of roads and sidewalks, which translates into a high comfort of daily use of public spaces. Street lighting in this district is well-developed, and there are no significant complaints regarding its effectiveness or safety after dark. The sewage system and utility supply operate efficiently, without major incidents of failure. The quality of internet and electrical infrastructure meets the expectations of the residents of Oliwa, which also benefits from its strategic location and good access to public transport (proximity to SKM, trams, buses). A clear advantage of this district is access to green and recreational areas and a gentle connection between the urban fabric and natural areas. In some locations, the dominant issue remains the need to modernize sections of old sidewalks, and feedback from residents also indicates a high occupancy of parking spaces, which at times hinders pedestrian passage. The infrastructure in Oliwa is generally considered safe, well-maintained, and conducive to pedestrians and cyclists. Comprehensive repair actions and investments in this district have been visible for years, resulting in a very high level of infrastructure maintenance, which is cited as a model for other parts of the city. The lack of serious deficiencies in aspects such as water supply, sewage, internet quality, or regular waste collection means that the overall quality of life in Oliwa, in terms of technical infrastructure, is rated as very good.

Oliwa achieves one of the highest ratings among the districts of Gdańsk in terms of low noise levels, high air quality, and maintenance of public areas.

The availability of real estate listings in Oliwa is low – older tenement houses dominate, there are few new listings, and demand is high. Finding an apartment or house is difficult, listings appear rarely and often through recommendations.

Oliwa ranks roughly at an average level in terms of real estate affordability – prices are slightly above the city average, with a significant range between old and new developments.

Oliwa is considered one of the safest districts in Gdańsk, with a very high sense of security among residents, good cooperation with the authorities, and a low level of crime.

Oliwa stands out for its excellent public transport quality – numerous tram and bus stops, high frequency of services, and great connections to the city center and other key districts make it one of the best-connected parts of Gdańsk.

Olszynka is distinguished by a large amount of greenery, low building density, and a calm, idyllic character; however, it lacks cohesive, valuable architecture and a more well-maintained urban fabric.

Olszynka is characterized by a poor availability of shops, restaurants, and basic services, which significantly lowers the quality of daily life for the residents of this district.

Olszynka offers very limited opportunities in terms of culture and entertainment — there are no cinemas, theaters, or museums, and cultural and socio-artistic events are rather local and sporadic.

Olszynka has a moderate availability of green and recreational areas – undeveloped land, natural greenery, and outskirts dominate here, but there is a lack of larger parks and developed recreational infrastructure, which affects the average rating.

Olszynka is a peripheral district that historically served mainly agricultural functions and was not a priority for urban infrastructure investments. The condition of the roads is average – there are both paved sections and parts with old, uneven surfaces, especially on side, local routes. Sidewalks are mainly present along the main streets, but on smaller streets, they are often missing or in poor condition, which limits the safety and comfort of pedestrians. Street lighting works well on the main roads, but in less frequented areas of Olszynka, there are noticeable gaps – there are poorly lit areas, especially near fields and uninhabited land. Sanitary sewage is available on the main streets, while in more remote areas, some properties still use septic tanks or individual solutions, which lowers the overall level of infrastructure. The water supply system is operational, but there are occasional reports regarding water pressure or clarity. The electrical and internet networks are stable, but internet speed can be lower than in the central districts of Gdańsk. Residents also point to a low frequency of repairs and investments – Olszynka remains sidelined in urban modernization plans, resulting in a slow pace of infrastructure improvement. In terms of waste management, there are no serious complaints, and basic services are provided. In summary, Olszynka lags behind the main, well-developed districts, but it does not experience catastrophic neglect – the level of infrastructure can be described as average, with clear needs for further investments in roads, sidewalks, and lighting.

Olszynka stands out for its very good level of quietness and cleanliness, with little traffic, moderate levels of pollution, and virtually no bothersome industry.

Olszynka is a district with very limited availability of real estate listings – both in terms of quantity and diversity of apartments and houses for sale or rent.

Olszynka is a district with clearly affordable real estate prices, significantly lower than the average for Gdańsk, making it very good in terms of price accessibility – although limited supply and the specific nature of the development may mean a somewhat narrower selection of properties for potential buyers.

Olszynka receives an average safety rating (3/6) – residents report feeling unsafe after dark due to poor lighting, low patrol presence, and an increased sense of threat.

Public transport in Olszynka is rated as poor – the district has a limited number of bus connections, infrequent service, and inconvenient transfers to the city center and other districts.

Orunia Górna–Gdańsk Południe presents an average aesthetic of development – modern housing estates with varying architectural quality dominate here, with a moderate amount of greenery and little urban coherence.

Orunia Górna–Gdańsk Południe offers very good access to trade and services, with a rich selection of shops, restaurants, and service points, which translates into a high quality of daily life for residents.

Orunia Górna–Gdańsk Południe offers a modest cultural and entertainment program, mainly focused on the activities of local cultural centers and occasional family events. Access to a richer cultural scene requires a trip to the central districts.

Orunia Górna–Gdańsk Południe is a dynamically developing district, with an increasing number of green and recreational areas; however, the infrastructure is not fully keeping up with the rapid pace of construction and the growing population.

The analysis of available data and residents' opinions indicates that Orunia Górna–Gdańsk Południe significantly lags behind the northern districts of Gdańsk in terms of technical infrastructure. The quality of roads and sidewalks is often criticized – reports and quotes from forum users highlight potholes, unfinished or makeshift surfaces, dust, and mud in the neighborhoods. Access to the city center and availability of public transport are poor, with long travel times and an insufficient number of bus lines. There is a noted lack of systematic investment in sidewalks and inadequate street lighting, which lowers the sense of safety. Residents suggest that this district still lacks targeted infrastructure solutions – modernizations are delayed in relation to demand. Access to sewage and other basic utilities is not a widespread problem, but it does not stand out positively either. Compared to districts such as Wrzeszcz, Brzeźno, or Przymorze, the south lacks comfortable, wide sidewalks and well-thought-out cycling infrastructure. Another significant downside is the noticeable shortage of parking spaces, increasing traffic jams, and a number of nurseries and kindergartens that are not keeping pace with development, which residents associate with the overall neglect of neighborhood infrastructure. Ongoing road investments have somewhat improved the situation (e.g., in Jasień after the opening of a new artery), but they have not yet translated into a noticeable leap in quality in Orunia Górna–Gdańsk Południe. In summary: the district requires urgent, comprehensive infrastructure actions and currently deserves a rating of 2/6, which means "poor infrastructure."

Orunia Górna–Gdańsk Południe is characterized by a very good level of air quality, moderate noise levels, and well-maintained streets, making this district attractive in terms of ecology and quality of life.

Orunia Górna–Gdańsk Południe stands out for its good availability of apartment listings, especially among new buildings, which provides a solid selection for those looking for real estate, although it is not the highest availability in the city.

Orunia Górna–Gdańsk Południe is characterized by affordable prices for apartments and houses compared to Gdańsk, although it is not one of the cheapest districts. The price offerings are attractive, especially in comparison to the coastal areas and the city center, but it still falls a bit short of being one of the best locations in this regard in the city.

Orunia Górna–Gdańsk Południe is considered a district with a moderately good level of safety, although there is a lack of detailed data and notable criminal issues.

Orunia Górna–Gdańsk Południe offers an average level of public transport – the stops are accessible, but the frequency of services and the need for transfers significantly reduce the comfort of daily travel for residents.

Orunia–Św. Wojciech–Lipce is characterized by a large amount of greenery and low building density; however, in terms of architectural attractiveness and urban coherence, it falls short compared to the highest-rated districts of Gdańsk.

The Orunia–Św. Wojciech–Lipce district is characterized by poor access to trade and services, which is confirmed by both statistical data and residents' opinions. The range of shops and services here is very limited compared to other areas of Gdańsk.

The Orunia–Św. Wojciech–Lipce district is characterized by a poor cultural and entertainment offer – there are no cinemas, theaters, well-known museums, or places for regular entertainment events, and most initiatives are of a local social meeting nature.

Orunia–Św. Wojciech–Lipce offers very good recreational conditions – the district has a large, well-maintained Oruński Park with a modern playground, numerous green areas, and an ever-improving infrastructure. Residents express high satisfaction with access to greenery, although the range of recreational areas and the number of bike paths is somewhat lower than in the highest-rated coastal districts.

Analyzing the available research context and the opinions of residents, the district of Orunia–Św. Wojciech–Lipce ranks in the middle of Gdańsk's infrastructure ranking. The condition of local and neighborhood roads is average – there is a visible need for further investments, especially in terms of surface repairs and improving the state of sidewalks, which can be incomplete or damaged, particularly in the older parts of this district. The maintenance of cleanliness, the effectiveness of stormwater drainage, and the functioning of sewage systems are not the main sources of negative assessments here; however, residents have voiced concerns about outdated infrastructure and potential difficulties during periods of heavy rainfall. Street lighting is being systematically modernized – no alarming deficiencies in terms of safety or visibility have been noted, although there are places that require the addition of streetlights or the replacement of outdated fixtures. The electrical network and internet availability maintain an acceptable standard, as does waste collection and sorting. A problem can be the availability of public transport – some residents report extended travel times and insufficient frequency of bus services, which fits into a broader trend for the southern districts. Compared to southern Gdańsk (e.g., Jasień, Ujeścisko–Łostowice), Orunia–Św. Wojciech–Lipce appears to be more stable and is not in the worst condition, but it remains clearly below the level of northern and city center districts. Further investments in local roads, sidewalk repairs, and improvements in connectivity and pedestrian safety are recommended. In summary: the infrastructure of this district is average, moderately well-maintained, with significant potential for improvement.

The district of Orunia–Św. Wojciech–Lipce receives a very good rating for its low noise levels, clean air, and efforts to maintain clean streets, as confirmed by both residents' opinions and comparative analyses with other districts of Gdańsk.

Orunia–Św. Wojciech–Lipce offers an average availability of real estate, mainly houses, with a moderate variety of listings. It is not a very dynamic market like in the top districts, but it is also not among the worst supplied.

Orunia–Św. Wojciech–Lipce is among the cheapest districts of Gdańsk, offering apartment and house prices significantly below the city average, making it a very affordable option in the real estate market.

Orunia–Św. Wojciech–Lipce receives an average safety rating due to insufficient lighting infrastructure, low patrol presence, and higher crime rates—particularly noticeable after dark according to residents' opinions.

Public transport in the district of Orunia–Św. Wojciech–Lipce is rated as average – the availability of stops and the frequency of services are moderate, while the quality of connections to the city center and other districts leaves something to be desired.

Osowa stands out with a very good level of aesthetic quality in its development, thanks to its cohesive and intimate single-family architecture and a large amount of greenery. It is not a historical district and does not have monuments like Oliwa, but it is rated by residents and experts as one of the most pleasant districts to live in from a visual perspective.

The availability of trade and services in Osowa is limited – there is a lack of larger stores, restaurants, and a wide range of basic services.

Osowa offers very limited access to cultural institutions, cinemas, theaters, or museums, and cultural and entertainment events occur there sporadically; for a broader range of options, residents have to travel to the center of Gdańsk or Wrzeszcz.

Osowa is a district with a very large amount of green areas; the lake and surrounding forests promote recreation and active leisure. Residents' opinions are definitely positive, although we won't find large urban parks with extensive infrastructure like in Przymorze or Oliwa.

The analysis of the research context and residents' opinions clearly indicates that Osowa, along with other peripheral districts (e.g., Matarnia, Kokoszki), is facing serious infrastructure problems. Complaints about the condition of local roads are the most common – many of them are pothole-ridden, unpaved, or poorly maintained, which significantly extends travel time to other parts of the city (getting to the center can take up to an hour). Street lighting is also insufficiently developed, especially on the outskirts of the district, which decreases residents' sense of safety after dark. Sewage systems do not cover the entirety of Osowa – some areas still have makeshift water and sewage solutions, and there are also sporadic issues with the water supply network and stormwater drainage. Municipal investments in this area are perceived as inadequate, and residents also complain about the lack of bike paths and parking spaces, as well as the slow pace of renovations. Access to the internet and other telecommunications services is standard for Gdańsk, but the overall technical infrastructure lags behind that of the central and northern districts of the city. Osowa can boast of quiet, greenery, and tranquility, but unfortunately, this does not translate into a high quality of daily functioning in terms of infrastructure. In summary, Osowa is a district that requires urgent and extensive infrastructure investments, which justifies a rating of 2/6 ("poor infrastructure").

Osowa is a district of Gdańsk rated very well in terms of low noise, air quality, and overall aesthetic of the space; only occasional local issues may slightly lower the rating to the level of "very good."

The availability of real estate listings in Osowa is low – houses dominate, and the number of new and available apartments is severely limited, making it difficult to quickly and easily find an offer.

Osowa offers very affordable prices for apartments and houses compared to the city average, while maintaining a good quality of life, a peaceful environment, and moderately favorable price trends.

Osowa is considered a district with a good, though not outstanding, level of safety – it is not listed among areas with high risk, crime, or poor lighting, but it also does not belong to the top safest parts of Gdańsk.

Osowa has a limited number of bus connections and a location far from the center and other key districts, which significantly reduces the quality of public transport. Residents complain about the low frequency of services, long waiting times outside of peak hours, and difficult, time-consuming transfers.

Piecki–Migowo (Morena) receives a rating of 3 – the aesthetics of the buildings are average, with a significant presence of greenery, but also noticeable urban inconsistency and monotony of the large-panel housing estates.

Piecki–Migowo offers very good access to trade and services – there are supermarkets, cafes, and a developing service infrastructure. However, there is a lack of greater diversity in dining establishments and large shopping centers, which prevents the district from achieving the highest rating.

Piecki–Migowo offers a limited, mainly local cultural and entertainment offer, while larger attractions are primarily available in other, more central districts of Gdańsk.

Piecki–Migowo (Morena) receives an average rating (3) for green areas and recreation – the availability of parks and recreational facilities is moderate, although there are a few playgrounds, small parks, and bike paths.

Piecki–Migowo (commonly known as Morena) represents one of the fastest-growing parts of Gdańsk, and the dynamics of investment translate into both progress and certain infrastructural problems. Main roads, especially those renovated in recent years (Rakoczego Street, Jaśkowa Dolina), are in good technical condition, although the more distant internal and neighborhood streets are noticeably weaker – residents point out individual potholes, patched-up defects, and makeshift repairs. Sidewalks, although present along the main arteries, are still not wide and safe everywhere, and in older neighborhoods, they require modernization. Street lighting is well-developed and adapted to new investments, although it can be insufficient in side streets. The sewage system is relatively efficient, and no major failures have been reported; however, heavy rainfall in recent years has caused incidents of temporary flooding in lower-lying areas. The energy infrastructure and internet access are at a good level, which is also related to the large number of new residential buildings; modern blocks are equipped with high-speed internet, positively impacting the technical assessment. The waste management system is effective, although the increase in the number of residents generates more trash, and there are periodic complaints about overflowing bins. Public transportation is very well-developed, with access to trams and buses, but heavy traffic results in occasional jams, while the lack of sufficient parking spaces emerges as another problem reported by residents. Overall, Piecki–Migowo is a district with solid, continuously developing infrastructure; however, the intense development of housing does not always keep pace with the full modernization of roads and neighborhood infrastructure. Hence, the final assessment is 4 (good), taking into account both the undeniable investments and the current challenges as well as specific neglects in the older parts of the district.

Piecki–Migowo is characterized by very good air quality, a moderate level of noise, and well-maintained streets, which is confirmed by both residents' opinions and research results regarding cleanliness and quality of life.

Piecki–Migowo (Morena) stands out for its excellent availability of apartments for both sale and rent, as well as a wide variety of offers, including many new developments.